Ask Officials to Stop Upcoming Coyote & Bobcat Killing Contest in Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Ask Forest Officials to Stop Planned Killing Contest! from Wolf Patrol on Vimeo.

Wolf Patrol is asking Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest officials to stop the KB Memorial Predator Hunt from taking place on national forest lands. These kinds of contests should require an environmental impact statement or special permit at the very least, if they are taking place on federal land, so lets start asking why this contest is allowed to go forward without any oversight.

This predator hunt is planned for a portion of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest where six violent encounters occurred in 2018 between federally protected gray wolves and loose hunting hounds, such as those that will also be used during this hunt. While it is legal in Wisconsin to kill coyotes year around with no limit, Wolf Patrol believes organized wildlife killing events that offer cash prizes for the most animals killed should not be allowed anywhere on our national forest lands.

We might not be able to stop the hunt, but it shouldn’t be allowed on national forest lands without the legally required oversight. This is also an opportunity to draw attention to all the other coyote & bobcat killing contests in Wisconsin coming this winter, so please encourage everyone to contact CNNF forest officials:


Here’s an informative and well cited email to reference and read:

I have visited and utilized the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest system amongst dozens of other national forests throughout the United States during my lifetime. It has come to my attention that a predator hunting contest is planned for January 19, 2019 with the check-in site being in Townsend, Wisconsin, which is surrounded by CNNF lands.

I write to inform you that it is of my belief that a Special Use Permit should be required for the organizer’s of this commercial event, if hunters are expected to hunt in the surrounding national forest lands. There is a entry fee requirement, prizes are being offered and a payout. Those conditions make the event large enough to warrant oversight and should be categorized as commercial in nature, not exempt from the requirements of not needing a special use permit when hunting or conducting killing contest activities on National Forest lands. This killing contest is a commercial enterprise and therefore should be required to obtain a “special use permit” and to comply with all rules, regulations and laws applicable under the Endangered Species Act.

I would draw to your attention the following legal concerns and implications:

36 C.F.R. § 251.50 Scope.

(a) All uses of National Forest System lands, improvements, and resources, except those authorized by the regulations governing sharing use of roads (§ 212.9); grazing and livestock use (part 222); the sale and disposal of timber and special forest products, such as greens, mushrooms, and medicinal plants (part 223); and minerals (part 228) are designated “special uses.” Before conducting a special use, individuals or entities must submit a proposal to the authorized officer and must obtain a special use authorization from the authorized officer, unless that requirement is waived by paragraphs (c) through (e)(3) of this section. 36 C.F.R. § 251.50

Screen Shot 2018-12-18 at 8.23.52 PM

Red= 2018 wolf/hunting hound conflict site, Blue= Location of KB Memorial Predator Hunt.

I would also bring to your attention with this proposed coyote killing contest that the contestants are likely to be considered to having caused a “takings” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when they interfere with the gray wolf while conducting their activities. Have your biologists weighed in whether the killing contest will impact wolves for purposes of the ESA? Subject to a few exceptions listed in other areas of the statute, Section 9(a) of the ESA lists forbidden actions against endangered species.

These forbidden actions include the importing, exporting, taking, possessing, selling, delivering, offering to sell, etc. of individual animals that are part of the endangered species.  “Take” is defined as “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” I would argue, that unleashing dozens or hundreds of hunters within the national forest to embark upon a killing contest in wolf habitat would fall within what is considered harming or known as a taking.

The National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C.S. §§ 1600-1614, empowers the U.S. Forest Service to make rules to regulate the occupancy and use of National Forest lands. 16 U.S.C.S. § 551. Pursuant to authority, the Forest Service promulgated 36 C.F.R. § 251.50(a), which requires a private user of a National Forest to obtain a special use permit to engage in any activity not specifically exempted. 36 C.F.R. § 251.50(c) exempts noncommercial recreational activities, such as camping, picnicking, hiking, fishing, boating, hunting, and horseback riding. The regulations define a “noncommercial use or activity” as any use or activity that does not involve a commercial use or activity. 36 C.F.R. § 251.51. A “commercial use or activity” is, in part, any use or activity on National Forest System lands where the primary purpose is the sale of a good or service, regardless of whether the use or activity is intended to produce a profit.

Again, the killing contest has an entry fee, payouts and is commercial in nature. I realize that 36 C.F.R. § 251.50(c) provides, in part, that no special use authorization is required for noncommercial recreational activities such as camping, picnicking, hiking, fishing, hunting, horseback riding, and boating. However, even these noncommercial activities may be subject to the permit requirement under § 251.50(c)(1), if authorization of such use is required by an order issued pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50

I have great concern that a commercial contest for the largest coyote killed in an area with a healthy gray wolf population is putting federally ESA protected wildlife at risk. As you may be aware, there were also 6 reported conflicts between wolves and hunting dogs in the area of the planned KB Memorial Predator Hunt in Townsend.

Thank you for your assistance and I hope you can tell me of any legal requirements for predator killing contests on CNNF forest lands and whether your office will be requiring a special use permit and consultation with USFS biologist to determine the impact this proposed killing contest will have on the Federally listed endagered wolf population.


A January 2014 photo posted on Facebook by Wisconsin hound hunter Francis Metz.


Wolf Patrol Offers Reward to Deer Hunters Witnessing Wolf Poaching

KOHL WOLF 11.18.17

Wolf illegally killed on November 18, 2017 during Wisconsin’s last deer season. Steven Kohl of Manitowoc was charged and is awaiting trial for the incident.


November 15, 2018- On the eve of both a full House of Representatives vote to delist federally protected gray wolves, and the beginning of Wisconsin’s 9-day gun deer season, the activist group, Wolf Patrol is reminding licensed deer hunters that shooting a wolf in the state is a federal crime. They are offering a $1000 cash reward for any information on illegal wolf killings during deer season.

Gray wolves were returned to federal protection in Wisconsin in December 2014, after the state held three managed wolf hunts that resulted in the killing of over 500 wolves. The current estimated population statewide according to Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources is just under a 1,000 animals, mostly in the northern portion of the state.

“We believe deer season in Wisconsin should be a time for family traditions, not federal crimes.” states Jennifer Garde, a Wolf Patrol member from Friesland, Wisconsin. Since 2014, Wolf Patrol has been monitoring controversial hunting practices that put federally protected wolves at risk, such as the practice of running dogs after bear, which results in over a dozen wolf depredations on hunting dogs each year. When wolves kill or injure hunting dogs, illegal killing of wolves is often promoted by those affected.

“Wolf Patrol is not against hunting, but we are adamantly opposed to deer hunters taking pot shots at wolves in anger or retaliation for dog depredations or the federal government’s unwillingness to return wolves in Wisconsin to state control.” continues Garde, “Gray wolves in Wisconsin help prevent the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease amongst our state’s vital deer population, and some of our own members will be out in the field hunting in wolf territory where they’ve seen some nice bucks. Wolves are a hunter’s friend, not enemy, and their continuing return to Wisconsin will help ensure many successful deer seasons to come.”

The $1000 reward offered by Wolf Patrol is available to anyone who provides credible information on any illegal wolf killing to Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources and that results in any individual being charged for killing a wolf. Informants can remain anonymous and can claim multiple rewards.

CONTACT: Jennifer Garde 920-723-2890 or Laura Menefree 920-264-8358



Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.21.43 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.22.02 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.22.21 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.22.37 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.22.53 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 12.23.13 PM.png




House of Representatives to Vote on Wolf Delisting Friday…CALL YOUR REP NOW!!!


Wisconsin hound hunters, Forest County 2013.

In their desperate attempt to satisfy the trophy hunting lobby, the full House of Representatives will vote this Friday on whether federal protections for gray wolves in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan should be stripped. If the vote succeeds, it would mean a return to Wisconsin’s hound hunt for wolves, as well as trapping season, and a firearms season that would coincide with deer season.


It is imperative that every wolf ally in the Great Lakes states call their local representatives and politely request that they vote no on HR 6784, the federal delisting of gray wolves. To find out who your representative is, visit the link below:

Here is all you have to say:

“My name is (your name) and I am a voting constituent in (your hometown). I am calling to let Representative (Your Rep) know that I am strongly opposed to the Congressional delisting of wolves, and to urge (him/her) to vote NO on H.R. 6784. Thank you.”


Wisconsin trophy hunters 2013.

twitter3[1]Tweet your U.S. Representative. Make sure to use the relevant hashtags #WarOnWolves and #StopExtinction. Here’s a sample tweet (but feel free to craft your own):

.@[your Representative’s Twitter name] please stop the #WarOnWolves and vote #NoOnHR6784. Help us to #StopExtinction and #keepwolvesprotected!


Closer Look at Wisconsin DNR’s Covergirl

SKYE GOODE 10.20.18

Goode with unintentional trapped bobcat October 29, 2018

During the Winter of 2018, several Wisconsin state legislators, including authors and sponsors of the 2016 “Right to Hunt Act” which specifically targeted Wolf Patrol, pressured Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to remove the group’s leader, Rod Coronado from the WDNR volunteer-based, Large Carnivore Tracking Program. The program conducts one of the most thorough wolf counts in the country, relying on citizens to conduct surveys on their own throughout the winter when snow makes tracking much easier.

Screen Shot 2018-02-27 at 11.38.12 AM

Reasons cited for Coronado’s removal were his past criminal record, his current legal involvement with Wolf Patrol and a completely unfounded accusation of sexual assault from a disgruntled crew member in 2014. Unfortunately, the WDNR decided to side with this group of politicians and remove Coronado stating, “past criminal behavior disqualified him from volunteer activities with the DNR” adding, “Coronado’s continued activities involving interactions with hunters is incompatible with the DNR’s mission.”

Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 2.04.38 PM

I’ve been with Wolf Patrol since the Main Street Ed’s coyote killing contest in Argonne, Wisconsin in January 2016. In that time I have never once seen Rod or any other member of Wolf Patrol engage in anything even questionable, much less, illegal. I’ve also tracked with Rod and in the two years he was involved with the tracking program, he has always recorded everything he’s found completely and accurately. Removing Rod had nothing to do with incompatibility with the WDNR’s mission, and everything to do with political pressure from Wolf Patrol’s detractors in the Wisconsin Legislature.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 6.55.23 PM

Anybody who doubts this need look no further than the case of Wisconsin trapper, Skye Adeline Goode and her relationship with WDNR. Goode frequently updates her Facebook page with tales of her trapping exploits (including using scent lures to attract wolves, which is illegal) and has posted photos of an “accidentally” trapped wolf last year.

In 2015, Goode was convicted of violating WDNR Statute NR10.07(2)(a) related to baiting and ordered to pay a fine of $345.50. Fast forward to the present day when WDNR chose to use a photo of game law violator Skye Goode on the cover of its annual 2018 Wisconsin Trapping Regulations booklet, as an example of a recreational trapper employing “best management practices.”

Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 1.33.17 PM

So the WDNR (under pressure from state politicians) uses the excuse of a decades-old conviction that has nothing to do with game laws, Wolf Patrol’s perfectly legal activity in the field and vicious unfounded rumors to prohibit Rod from volunteering with WDNR. Meanwhile WDNR turns around and puts a trapper with a questionable past as well as a recent conviction on the cover of their trapping regulations?


More intentional and unintentional captures by Goode in 2017.

That’s not looking out for your public image or your “mission”– its blatant hypocrisy. The WDNR waited two years to remove Rod because of his widely known past convictions as well as his current completely legal activities and than champion a trapper who violated game laws just three years ago? That doesn’t add up.

Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 1.57.54 PM

Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 1.58.18 PM

Here’s what does add up, like most Wisconsin trappers, Goode sells her pelts on the foreign market. Listed are the prices from the fur buyer Goode sells too.


Goode posing with a trapped federally protected Wisconsin wolf in 2017.


Wisconsin’s Fall Trapping Season Doubles as Illegal Wolf Trapping Season


Wisconsin trapper John Oens with yet another trapped wolf.

Every year since gray wolves were returned to federal protections in 2014, Wisconsin trapper John Oens has been catching them in his coyote traps. Wisconsin’s recreational/commercial trapping season begins in October, and is the cause of many “incidental” trapping incidents involving legally protected wolves.

For trappers like Oens, the illegal captures have become an easy way to gain attention on YouTube, with videos of the wolves being released from his traps receiving millions of views. Most viewers are unaware that Oens himself is the cause of what has become his annual wolf captures. This kind of state sponsored harassment of a federally protected species to boost YouTube views should be condemned by Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and prosecuted as the harassment of federally protected wildlife.

Another grave example of how Wisconsin’s coyote trapping season is threatening gray wolves in the state, is the actual incidents when incidentally trapped wolves are illegally killed by trappers, as happened last December outside of Spooner, Wisconsin.

On the morning of December 27, 2017 an off-duty police officer from the small town of Siren, Wisconsin was driving home when he saw a wolf caught in a trap west of Spooner near the Yellow River. The local officer called the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ (WDNR) Violator Hotline before returning to the location of the trapped wolf. Upon returning, he saw a green Chevy truck with a dog box, that the officer recognized as belonging to a local bear hunter, Alfred Paulson. He also noticed that the wolf was no longer in the trap.

Less than an hour later, a couple from Madison, Wisconsin discovered a dead wolf hidden in brush in the same area, and as they were leaving encountered Paulson who admitted that he had released a wolf earlier from one of his coyote traps. Later that afternoon, the off-duty officer again returned to the location, this time following the blood trail from Paulson’s trap site, where he first saw the wolf, to where the dead wolf was now hidden under a spruce tree with a single gunshot wound to the head.


Illegally killed wolf in Michigan 2017.

WDNR conservation officer Jesse Ashton responded to the officer’s tip, collecting the dead wolf and other evidence from the scene of the crime, before running the license plate from the green hound truck seen near the trap site. The truck was registered to Paulson, who was visited by WDNR officer Ashton in Spooner. Paulson denied killing the wolf, but said he had discovered the dead animal dragged away from his coyote trap site.

On July 10, 2018, officer Ashton returned to Paulson’s residence with US Fish & Wildlife Special Agent Darin Brandenburg and a search warrant, to look for the .22 caliber rifle that was used to kill the wolf last December, according to findings from the USFWS forensics laboratory. Again Paulson was questioned, and finally when shown the findings on the four .22 shell casings collected from his trap site, admitted to shooting the wolf with his .22 rifle and dragging the body into the woods where it was later discovered.

This incident is also evidence that many trappers are also Wisconsin hound hunters, waging a campaign against federally protected wolves that they believe are responsible for killing hunting dogs. Wolf Patrol has long reported on the public support amongst hound hunters for wolf poaching. Public threats on social media regularly follow depredation incidents, especially in areas where bear hounds have been recently killed, as is the case in Burnett County, where Paulson killed his wolf.


2017 Wolf depredations on hunting dogs in Burnett County (red square location of Paulson’s trapped wolf).

During 2017’s Wisconsin bear season, five conflicts were reported between bear hounds and wolves in Burnett County where Paulson and many bear hunt. In addition, according to WDNR, on December 22, 2017, just five days before Paulson trapped and killed his illegal wolf, a hunting beagle was injured by wolves in Burnett County. During the 2018 bear hunt, two more wolf conflicts with bear hounds were reported with another four occurring just north, in Douglas County.


2018 Wolf depredations on hunting dogs in Burnett & Douglas Counties.

A recent study published in the Journal of Mammalogy and conducted by the University of Wisconsin found that WDNR has been systematically underreporting the illegal killing of wolves in the state. The study analyzed data collected from dead wolves from 1979 to 2012, and found that 37% of those wolves reported as roadkill were most likely killed by gunshot.

The Alfred Paulson wolf poaching case is moving forward with a status conference planned for this November 2018. Please join Wolf Patrol in calling for the maximum punishment in this latest example of Wisconsin’s war on wolves!

If you would help, letters in the Paulson case are now needed!

Here’s the addresses and a sample letter with more information, remember you must send a copy of your letter to each of the listed parties:

Judge Melissa Mogen
Burnett County Courts
7410 County Road K
Siren, WI 54872

Thomas Mulligan II, Defense Attorney
Mulligan Law Office
P.O. Box 457
Spooner, WI 54801

Daniel Patrick Steffen, District Attorney
7410 County Rd. K
Siren, WI 54872

Judge Melissa Mogen
Burnett County Court
Clerk of Courts Office
7410 County Road K
Siren, WI 54872

cc: Thomas Mulligan II, Defense Attorney
Daniel Patrick Steffen, District Attorney

State of Wisconsin vs. Alfred Paulson Burnett County Case Number 2018CM000223

Dear Judge Mogen,

I am writing in earnest to ask that you find Alfred Paulson guilty of poaching an endangered species, the Gray Wolf, and penalize him to the maximum extent possible. I volunteer for the WDNR as a carnivore tracker, frog & toad surveyor, turtle monitor, monarch butterfly monitor and I do water clarity monitoring as well. I value all wildlife for their importance to a diverse and healthy ecosystem and thoroughly enjoy seeing and hearing them daily. Gray Wolves provide many ecological benefits and this is born out in science research as well.

Law enforcement criminal complaints show this wolf was alive in the trap when a citizen discovered it. Alfred Paulson did not incidentally catch this wolf. He is stating that he was trapping for coyotes and that is a lie based on the following two facts:

Trappers have incidental catches all too frequently. If the incidentally trapped animal is alive, the WDNR asks only that the animal be released. If the released animal is a protected/threatened/endangered animal, the ethical trapper is encouraged to report it to the WDNR and that would be it.

If this indeed was an unintentionally trapped wolf, why would Alfred Paulson not have simply released the wolf? Mr. Paulson planned to intentionally kill this wolf. Mr. Paulson knew there were wolves in the area, as he is a bear hound hunter. Furthermore, the report also states the complainant recognized “it [the owner of the Green Chevy truck] as a subject who hunts bears with dogs in the area…” According to WDNR’s “Wolf Pack Count Details”, there are wolves identified in that area/tracking block as well as surrounding tracking blocks.

I track in a block adjacent to the block where Alfred Paulson hunts for bears with his dogs and where he also traps. It is a well-known fact that hound hunting dogs who are sent off of bait sites into areas where wolves are raising their young, are often killed by the wolves who are protecting their territories. It is also a well-known fact that some hound hunters will/have killed wolves that live in their hound hunting areas so they will not interfere with their dogs. Alfred Paulson knew wolves ran in his hunting area and laid his trap in a spot likely to catch a wolf.

Wolves should not be persecuted and are protected by federal law. The Gray Wolf was extirpated from Wisconsin back in the 1950‘s by people such as Alfred Paulson. Wolves have been persecuted for centuries and it continuing to this day. Since then, Wisconsin has spent millions of dollars and numerous decades to monitor wolves and their migration back into Wisconsin from Minnesota. A 2014 survey by the WDNR showed that a majority of northern rural WI residents want a robust population of wolves in our state. We are one of only a handful of states fortunate enough to still have wolves.

Regretfully, a minute but lethal segment of WI society subscribe to the “SSS” (shoot, shovel and shut-up) mentality which, as stated earlier, is what extirpated wolves to begin with. They are willing to illegally kill a wolf for a misguided long-held hatred of wolves and they believe they won’t get caught.

Recent science has indicated that poaching of wolves is higher in Wisconsin than previously espoused…/study-says-wisconsin-d…/97373334/ Also see Gray Wolf Mortality Patterns in Wisconsin: 1979-2012 –, 02 February 2017; “Mismeasured mortality: Correcting estimates of wolf poaching in the United States –…/…/Treves_etal_2017b.pdf

Alfred Paulson was charged under state statutes/guidelines rather than federally charged with civil and criminal penalties. Cruelly poaching a federally protected species violates the Endangered Species Act and draws a much harsher punishment (

Federal agencies defer to the states and expect criminal penalties will be imposed. Examples of penalties for this crime at the federal level under statute: Fines up to $50,000; 6 months in jail and license suspension. In the recent Michigan wolf poaching case decided on 2/20/18, Honorable C Joseph Schwedler sentenced Donald Curtis Aberly of Crystal Falls to both fines and restitution of $2,255, probation and revocation of hunting and trapping privileges.

Additionally, I encourage you to consider imposing the following:

1) Attendance at a wolf education seminar/workshop;

2) Attendance at a wolf education training program that would follow with Alfred Paulson attending schools to talk w/ young students about the concepts learned in the wolf education program including the value of wolves.

3) Suspension of trapping privileges for three years.

Thank you for your work on this case and the opportunity given for citizen input.

Polk County


First Report on 2018 Wisconsin Bear Hunter & Wolf Conflicts

This year’s Wisconsin black bear hunt was the source of multiple conflicts between wolves and bear hunting hounds with a total of twenty-one deadly fights reported, killing sixteen dogs and injuring an unknown number of wolves. Wolf Patrol is the only organization in the country opposing this conflict in the northwoods of Wisconsin, where it is happening.


Wisconsin bear hunting truck with hounds

Our presence in the field has become a thorn in the side of hound hunters, who know that we are monitoring for illegal hunting activities in places where no other wolf groups dare to operate. Here’s Part One of our update from the field, which begins in early June when bear baiting season begins. This film covers our monitoring of the first month of bear hound training season which began July 1st.

In addition to reporting bear baits out of compliance to Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Wolf Patrol again documented the prolific bear baiting taking place in Wolf Caution Areas where bear hounds have been killed by wolves on public lands. We successfully asserted our rights to maintain experimental bear baits in an effort to document and illustrate the impact intentional feeding has on black bears in this part of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, where DNR researchers found that 40% of a black bear’s diet is composed of bear bait set out by humans.


Bear hound seriously injured by wolves July 2018.

Only nine months ago, hound hunters in Wolf Patrol’s Forest County operating area confronted our research team, illegally detaining and assaulting our patrol in their claim that we were breaking Wisconsin’s unconstitutional hunter harassment laws. We responded with a video campaign highlighting the illegal and cruel practices associated with hound hunters in Wisconsin, that itself resulted in a criminal investigation of those featured in the videos.

Not only did Wolf Patrol return, but Forest County Sheriff’s deputies and DNR wardens also responded, helping us recover stolen trail cameras and bring out of compliance bear baits into compliance. We also distributed dog bells to two groups of hound hunters, which have been proven to help reduce conflicts between bear hounds and wolves.


Forest County Sheriff’s deputy investigating trail camera theft.

The next installment of Wolf Patrol’s Report on the 2018 Wisconsin Bear Hunter & Gray Wolf Conflict will focus on the multiple depredations on bear hounds attributed to wolves that took place outside of our Forest County patrol area.



Tyler Kettlewell’s dogs baying a bear.

Wolf Patrol Welcomes Fire Keeper Wolves to Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest!

On the last weekend of Wisconsin’s 2018 bear hunt, Wolf Patrol recorded the howls coming from the newly named Fire Keeper Pack, while monitoring continued bear hunting in two Wolf Caution Areas in northern Wisconsin.

Since 2016, Wolf Patrol has been monitoring wolf activity in portions of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in Forest County. We were first drawn to the area because of illegal wolf killings and baiting meant to kill wolves discovered in the area. Since then we have been confronted by hound hunters opposed to Wolf Patrol’s presence on these national forest lands, including in January 2018, when hounders blockaded our patrol vehicle and assaulted our crew.

This Summer we began monitoring bear hunting activities, in particular bear baiting and hound training in areas where we identified multiple wolf packs over the past two winters of tracking. This portion of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest is popular with many bear hunters, and it wasn’t long before we began seeing wolf sign at bear baits in the area.

Screen Shot 2018-10-12 at 3.11.06 PM

On August 30, 2018 a bear hound was injured by wolves in this portion of the national forest, and then the very next day, two more bear hounds were killed by wolves in the immediate area we had been patrolling since June 2018. Once bear hound training season was over, and the killing season began in September, another bear hound was injured by wolves on September 18th. Finally, on September 29, one more bear hound was killed, just north of where two were killed on August 31st.

A common factor in all the areas where bear hounds were injured or killed in Forest County in the 2018 Wisconsin bear season is the prevalence of bear baits, that attract wolves to locations where bear hounds are also released to trail bears from the bait sites.

Wisconsin’s bear hunting season may be over, but the threat posed by hound hunters in Forest County to wolves in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest is far from over. Historically, wolf poaching occurs during Wisconsin’s firearms deer season, and once snow has fallen, making wolf tracking by poachers much easier.

Wolf Patrol will continue monitoring wolf activity in Forest County and the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest throughout winter 2018-19, which is also the time when hound hunters return to these forests to hound hunt for bobcat and coyote.

You can join Wolf Patrol in our battle to protect the wolves of Wisconsin by sending an email to US Forest Service officials asking that the conflicts created by hound hunters on our national forests be addressed and prevented with greater regulation of bear baiting and hound hunting & training.


gaspardo wolf